Caitlyn Jenner. Photo, Annie Leibovitz
Semi-professional douche-bag/ blogger, Matt Walsh
Both liberals and conservatives are often accused of living inside a bubble and not listening to the “other side.” Not that this is a rationed argument that makes any sense to ME, but in the interest of “listening”, I went to The conservative (crazy) website The Blaze and found Rush Limbaugh spouting off his option on the liberal agenda;
“Conservative and Republicans are the new weirdos, the new kooks — and that is part of the political objective here in normalizing all of this really marginal behavior. I mean, if less than 1 percent of the population’s engaging in it, it’s marginalized behavior. It isn’t normal, no matter how you define it.”
Okaaaay. So, I read on and clicked on The Blaze‘s Matt Walsh opinion piece on Caitlyn Jenner, who he refuses to refer to as such, still calling her Bruce. He lays out his argument in detail, but here are some low-lights;
Parents, be aware: soon the magazine rack in the checkout line at the supermarket will feature this profoundly disturbing image of Bruce Jenner. The picture is plastered right on the cover of the next Vanity Fair issue, and it shows Bruce dolled up in makeup and hair extensions, posing in a corset, with parts of his face, forehead, and throat shaved off for cosmetic reasons, and his chest enhanced by hormone pills, Photoshop, and silicone. The idea is to make the 65-year-old grandfather look like a college girl, but the effect is that he looks like a distorted version of neither.
What he most closely resembles is a mentally disordered man who is being manipulated by disingenuous liberals and self-obsessed gay activists. Far from having the appearance of a genuine woman, he reminds me of someone who is being abandoned to his delusions by a culture of narcissistic imbeciles. I feel a great deal of compassion when I gaze upon this tragic sight — especially because post-op “transgenders” very often regret their decision, and in many cases attempt suicide — but few share my love or concern for him.
Can you stand any more of this? If so, read on a bit more, otherwise skip below because I want you to do something;
Feminism and transgenderism say two opposing things about what it means to be a woman. In fact, feminists have come up with the term “neurosexism” to condemn the misogynistic and “pseudo-scientific” idea that male and females brains are different. But Bruce Jenner claims he has “the brain of a female,” so how does this work? Do you mean to tell me that the only people who can have female brains are males?
Meanwhile, feminists regularly insist that the absence of a uterus and a vagina excludes men from having an opinion about things like abortion. So a man can’t have ideas about women’s issues because he lacks the correct anatomy, but he can actually be a woman despite lacking the correct anatomy?
How does that make any kind of sense?
Transgenderism and feminism cannot coexist. Progressives can’t have both.
They’ll just have to choose.
There’s more and you can read the whole twisted, dumb rant here. Do click on the link even if you can’t stand another sentence because there’s a poll and when I took it, he was “winning”. You can see that now, this IS an insult to women? Vote NO and let’s see if we can get his own stupid poll to contradict his thesis. I’ll leave you with his parting thoughts;
Last question for the people — particularly straight men — who claim there is no real distinction between a “transgender” woman and a real woman: Would you marry a woman who used to be a man? Would you look at this “former” man and think, “I want to make him my wife?”
Answer: No. You wouldn’t. You won’t. And you know it. Instinctively, when it comes down to it, where your life and love are concerned, you recognize the difference between a biological woman in all her glory, and a castrated man in all his derangement. I’m spending thousands of words convincing you of something you know. And I know you know it. And everyone knows that everyone knows it.
So why are we still having this conversation?
That I don’t know. But as long as it continues, I’ll keep reminding you of the things you already know, because someone has to.
Bruce Jenner is not a woman in any sense or to any extent.
And you already knew that.
(via The Blaze)
The post The Blaze’s Matt Walsh: “Calling Bruce Jenner a Woman Is an Insult to Women” appeared first on World of Wonder.
